Feuerbach and Nietzsche - 877 Words

Humans need the appearance of some sort of structure to live. They need rules to live by to tell them whether or not they are living â€Å"right†, in a good way or a bad way. We humans have come up with many different ways to tell whether we are living right â€Å"right† or not. We have come up with all of the different types of religions and the different sets of morals , all of which change throughout history and time depending on and reflecting it’s episteme. How can any religion or set of morals be considered the â€Å"right one† when there has been no consistency with either? Both Feuerbach and Nietzsche have the same belief, that religions and morals are only a crutch that humans grab on to in order to give some meaning to the random assortment of life on earth. Both think that religion was a crutch for humans because of our inability to be perfect. Religions especially Christianity (Jesus) have their own destruction built in to them because of the h umanity aspect. Though Feuerbach and Nietzsche agreed upon this they had very different opinions on how it would come about. Feuerbach believes that religion has it’s built in destruction and that it will give way to humans being able to believe in our own capabilities. He writes,If man is to find contentment in God, he must find himself in God. (The Essence of Christianity). Religion is humanity’s consciousness of themselves as beings and therefore humans are God. When Feuerbach says â€Å"religion is the alienation of man fromShow MoreRelatedThe Between Mccutcheon, Marx, And Nietzsche s Theories On Religion921 Words   |  4 Pagesreligious and how our religion ultimately affects our behaviors. Feuerbach, Marx, and Nietzsche all suspect the study of religion is not about God at all, but rather the people who believe or do not believe in God. In this essay, I will elaborate on the similar yet completely different ideologies of Feuerbach, Marx, and Nietzsche and com pare them to the argument made by McCutcheon. In order to comprehend the connection between McCutcheon, Feuerbach, Marx, and Nietzsche’s theories on religion a few termsRead MoreTo Live for God or for Meaning737 Words   |  3 Pageswritings of Feuerbach and Nietzsche. This change happened for a variety of reasons including but not limited to the proving of scientific facts that did not coincide with religious beliefs (evolution, the sun is the center of our galaxy, etc.), the changing societal structure that reduced religious involvement in everyday life and the doors opened by past philosophers. This change is clearly seen through that differences between the writings of Descartes and the writings of Feuerbach. In the pastRead MoreChapter Guide for Twilight of Atheism1931 Words   |  8 Pageschange the way in which people thought.† -Ludwig Feuerbach was a revolutionary thinker who believed Christianity denied death. -Feuerbach argued against the idea of immortality because he felt as though that was distracting people from actually having real relationships with other people and their surroundings. - Feuerbach believed that Atheism would progress if the church was seen as not caring about the common person’s problems. - Feuerbach believed that humans had created God, and thus couldRead MorePolytheism2057 Words   |  9 PagesPolytheism Reproduced, with permission, from THE FUTURIST, Published by the World Future Society, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 450, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Toward the end of the nineteenth century, the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche wrote a fictional account of a madman who went about the town proclaiming that God is dead. Nietzsches story is illustrative of a wave of atheism that spread through the intellectual circles of Europe in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuriesRead MoreNew Tendencies Emerged : Paul Cezanne Essay2377 Words   |  10 Pagesformal religion. For him, â€Å"the clergymen’s God† was â€Å"dead as a doornail.† Although this seems similar to Nietzsche’ claim, expressed later, it carries only a verbal resemblance. While the religious beliefs of the European society in the second half of the 19th century were under attack by the aggressive explorations of philosophy by Feuerbach, Kierkegaard, Marx, Schleiermacher, and Nietzsche, there were no indications that Van Gogh followed or even was familiar with any of them . His dissatisfactionRead More Environmental Destruction: A Philosophical-Anthropological Perspective2466 Words   |  10 Pagesapart from a few exceptions — neglected up till now. Of course, this neglectance can be traced back to an philosophical — anthropological tradition that has been interrupted only by approaches developed by philosophers such as KIERKEGAARD, FEUERBACH, NIETZSCHE, MERLEAU-PONTY or SARTRE. Even representatives of the philosophical anthropology (PLESSNER, GEHLEN) have tried to rehabilitate concepts of lived body. In contrast to other concepts of man characterized by the ignorance of the lived bodyRead MoreEssay on Jewish Philosophers on Reason and Revelation3654 Words   |  15 Pagesac intelligibilis. Perhaps our faculty of reason can only be used in the realm of the mundus sensibilis, as Kant holds, and as a result the metaphysical world is left to our beliefs.(2) Or may be, we should leave this Kantian notion after Feuerbach and Nietzsche and accept Wittgensteins advice to keep silent about matters which we cannot comprehend? The Rationalistic School In order to attempt at giving an answer to the aforementioned questions, I now turn to the Jewish biblical-rabbinical-philosophicalRead MoreBranches of Philosophy8343 Words   |  34 Pages †¢ Freges work in logic and Sidgwicks work in ethics provided the tools for early analytic philosophy †¢ Husserl initiated the school of phenomenology †¢ Peirce and William James initiated the school of pragmatism †¢ Kierkegaard and Nietzsche laid the groundwork for existentialism †¢ Karl Marx began the study of social materialist philosophy. [edit] Contemporary philosophy (c. 1900 – present) Main article: Contemporary philosophy [edit] 20th century philosophy Within the last centuryRead MorePhilosophy of Man8521 Words   |  35 Pagesliving philosophers. Without any pretentions to originality the philosophers of man have acknowledged their great indebtedness to many of the philosophers of the past; notably to Blaise Pascal, Goethe, Kant, Herder, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Feuerbach, Nietzsche. They have drawn their greatest inspiration, however, from the works of Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911); one of the greatest philosophers of history and culture. Dilthey is noted for his thoroughgoing empiricism and for the encyclopedic range ofRead MoreCleanth Brookss Essay Irony as a Principle of Structure9125 Words   |  37 Pageswrote of Dietzgen: â€Å"It is his bad luck that he managed not to study Hegel.† (Letter to Engels, 7.11.1868.) And in another letter (dated 11.1.1868) we read: â€Å"The gentlemen in Germany ... think that Hegel’s dialectic is a ‘dead dog’. In this respect Feuerbach has much on his conscience.† In a letter dated 14 January, 1858 he lays emphasis on the ‘great benefits’ he has derived for his method of procedure with the Critique of Political Economy from his re-reading of Hegel’s Logic. But we are not here concerned